![]() This is absolutely not true if you want to sync to or from network attached storage devices (NAS). The GoodSync website clearly states that Mac extended attributes are preserved during file syncronization. Simple file syncronization tasks are easy to setup and can be easily autimated if needed. GoodSync has a good UI that is intuitive and the manual is excellent. you need to backup on Mac to actual disk formatted by Mac. Tech: yes, you NAS does not support any such thing. All of his responses were similar, no matter what information I provided. Here is one response a GoodSynch tech to a carefully crafted question from me that contained relevant log entries and observations. I really wanted to like this product and even offered a suggestion for a workaround but they weren't interested. Applications from other companies support syncing Mac extended attributes over SMB to a NAS albeit with a worse UI and poor documentation. ![]() GoodSync has a slick website that promises a critical feature that they can't deliver and thier tech support is rude, unhelpful and technically out-of-date. People who have used tools compare and merging tools will not have any issue. This is not really a bad thing as once understood or after using it for a while it be very easy to use. The way the data represented (conflicts, copy left to right and vice versa) and also the action that needs to be taken presented in a better way. It took some time to realize how exactly it works so first time users can find it a bit difficult. User Interface for synchronization can be improved. It is really fast and makes the easily done. I have 9 hard disks and i back up and sync between all of them using GoodSync. (the price is slight higher) -Ability to save sync or back jobs is very convenient and being able to group is quite nice. Synchronizing tool is very powerful and accurate -There is built support to sync with many cloud storage accounts (google drive, onedrive, box etc) -Portable version of the software is handy as it can be used in many computers. No need to have different tools for different jobs. Saves a lot of time and make the whole process easy. It takes care of comparing and we just have to choose what actions needs to be taken. Having a software like GoodSync, we don't really have do any manual tracking. In some cased it can be easily overlooked. We also need to keep track manually of the changed files and update. In terms of file-based syncs, though, I've had some luck with robocopy with multithreading options enabled, but you really have to tweak the underlying storage options (samba parameters, etc) to get metadata access times as low as can be a real pain.When we have too much data it is really easy to forget back up or sync. ![]() On the incredibly expensive side, you have things like NetApp/etc, and on the free-if-you-can-support-it side is ZFS, which is what I mainly use.īest practice would still be to have a second form of backup, but that second backup can run for longer periods of time in most cases since it's not your primary backup. The only really excellent solution I've ever found at that scale has been snapshot-based replication and manage snapshot retention at both ends. "NAS" style approaches (file based) can start to really fall apart at that scale. ![]() I've had to deal with this problem in several cases over the years with absurd numbers of files on a system. 100+TB and tons of files? The problem with huge (tens+/hundreds+ of millions) numbers of files is the metadata hit, rather than the sheer amount of bytes actually transferred.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |